Item 5 on the Recreation Commission Agenda is Consideration of an Exclusive Pickleball Trial at the Beach Tennis Courts for a Five-Month Period
from February 27, 2023 to July 31, 2023 and Parameters for the Trial
Item 5 on the Agenda.
The Recreation Commission will consider whether or not to go forward with the trial of dedicated Pickleball at Linda. Read the meeting agenda and participation particulars here.
Hello City Council:
I’ve reviewed the staff report and draft RFP for the Moraga Canyon Specific Plan (MCSP) and submit the following comments and questions. Hopefully you can delve into them.
The MCSP is good planning, but clearly the RFP is being developed to expedite a City application for Measure A funds by 2024. Perhaps for that reason, the RFP is short on explaining how the plan addresses important city policies. Table 2 list these policies but the RFP states that these policies “may” be considered and only stipulates that the consultant team will demonstrate “professional experience and knowledge of the personnel general principles and background law applicable to specific plans, land development and affordable housing development requirements”. There are important sustainability policies outlined in the General Plan and Climate Action Plan and the City should stipulate this a credential it seeks on the consultant team. Does the team have a sustainability expert like our City does? Traffic safety is another core credential that should be requested.
The staff report and RFP suggests that additional environmental review beyond the programmatic EIR will be conducted based on the impacts of the specific projects in the MCSP. That makes sense but is predicated on a robust programmatic EIR which has yet to be released. Without the programmatic EIR being public at this time, the generalities of that assessment may be used to gloss over specific impacts of the projects at a later date. One way to alleviate this concern is to assure that the programmatic EIR will have a response to comments process as a project specific EIR does. Staff should confirm this publicly. Subsection m. in scope of services should clarify this point as well.
One important EIR consideration is whether an assessment of GHG emissions will be undertaken in the MCSP. This assessment may occur in the “built out” programmatic EIR so this may not be a factor but without that document, who can say? To resolve this question, staff should clarify whether these GHG emission calculations are being conducted as a part of the programmatic EIR. According to state guidance, GHG emissions are to be part of a CEQA analysis: CEQA GHG. However, based on certain criteria, affordable housing projects under 100 units are exempt from CEQA and staff should clarify this as well CEQA Housing. Indeed, staff should clarify whether CEQA is applicable to all the projects being considered in the MCSP, particularly the low-income housing projects.
The staff report and RFP do not clarify whether the relocation of the Corporation Yard will be studied as part of the MCSP. The only possible reference to this is that “replacement” of the Corporation Yard be considered. The City should clarify this in the RFP so as to provide consultants the widest latitude to develop creative proposals for the canyon. Indeed, this latitude may provide for the subdivisions of parcels and development standards that are attractive to builders of housing at all income levels. As staff envisioned with civic center sites, the City could leverage better housing for the project if the Corporation Yard is moved to less desirable building site in the canyon.
Following are more specific comments/questions to the RFP:
The project timeline on page 5 of the staff report is particularly short on detail. The City seems not to have identified the type of public process it intend to conduct.
Under “Specific Plan for Success” there is no mention of field lighting as part of the recreational facilities to be developed. Is it the intent of the City and this Council not to proceed with the installation of lights at Coaches Field? There is some precedent for this.
The landscape plan makes no mention that it is to comply with the City’s municipal Bay Friendly Landscape Ordinance which has specific criteria for vegetation and water use.
Garrett Keating, Former Piedmont City Council Member
“The RFP does not set a price, but … [in 2019] … the preparation of a specific plan cost an average of $544,237.” according to ABAG.
This program requires an amendment to the City’s General Plan and the preparation of a specific plan to accommodate the density and create development standards for the unique site conditions. The required amendments would be reviewed by the City Attorney for conformance with the City Charter and other legal requirements. If it is determined that it is infeasible to develop this site during the planning process, the City will consider utilizing other City-owned properties as alternative sites (see Appendix B).
Currently, the fee is $0.013 x the construction cost valuation on building permits. The fee generated $427,000 in FY 21-22 and the City expects a similar amount this fiscal year. The funds must be spent on updates and amendments to the General Plan and other auxiliary documents (e.g., Climate Action Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Hazard Mitigation Plan, and a specific plan). The City Council might consider increasing this fee to help cover the rising costs of land use planning.
READ the full staff report in the link below:
Stay Informed about the Moraga Canyon Specific Plan
After the City adopts a 6th Cycle Housing Element, a key piece of the implementation process will be the creation of a Moraga Canyon Specific Plan. This initiative will study all City-owned land in Moraga Canyon with the goal of creating a detailed plan for how to maintain and improve existing amenities while also incorporating new housing in the area.
The City expects to issue an RFP in late January seeking professional services to lead this process. Stay informed by subscribing to our Moraga Canyon Specific Plan email list.
The Piedmont Recreational Facilities Organization (PRFO) is seeking $2.1 million additional funds for the project. The City Council will receive an update on the fundraising campaign and authorize staff to develop naming agreements for contributions of $250,000 or greater to the project. Consideration will be at the Tuesday, January 17, 2023 Council meeting. council-agenda 1.17.23
Staff report linked below:
On Tuesday, January 17th at 6:00pm the City Council will consider recommended Civic Center parking and circulation changes for the construction of the new Piedmont Pool Complex. >council-current-agenda 1.17.23
These proposals are intended to mitigate the loss of 57 parking spaces in the area due to pool construction, including 20 “Permit A” spaces and 21 spaces reserved for City employees. The proposed changes would:
• Convert Bonita Avenue between Vista and Oakland Avenues to one-way traffic towards Oakland Avenue
• Convert existing parallel parking on Bonita Avenue between Vista and Oakland Avenues to diagonal parking, creating 10 new spaces
• Remove two bus stops on Highland Avenue near the Sheridan strip and add diagonal parking
Details of the proposal are available in the agenda materials:
• Full agenda report > Staff Repprt 1.17.23 Changes to Parking and Traffic in the Civic Center Area to Accommodate Piedmont Community Pool Construction
• Exhibits illustrating proposed changes
Give feedback on proposed changes
The City Council will consider this proposal at its next meeting: Tuesday, January 17th, 2023 6:00pm City Council Chambers, Piedmont City Hall (120 Vista Avenue) Agenda
Community members can provide feedback on the proposed changes in advance of the meeting by email or speak at the meeting virtually or in-person:
• Email: Send comments to citycouncil@piedmont.ca.gov
• Comment remotely: Join the meeting on Zoom at https://piedmont-cagov.zoom.us/j/86233381014
If approved, the new configuration would remain in place until pool construction is complete, which could happen as soon as summer 2024.
2023-01-13-proposed-changes-to-civic-center-parking-and-circulation
Parking 2023-01-13-proposed-changes-to-civic-center-parking-and-circulation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the Housing Element was first considered and subsequently approved by the City Council for state consideration, residents have mentioned numerous concerns regarding the addition of the 587 new housing units. NOW, until January 8, 2023 is the time to inform the City of Piedmont of any environmental or other concerns you may have. See below for contact address. If you want your concern or interest to be part of the permanent record, note it in your communication and ask that a copy be sent to the Piedmont City Council.
|
|
|
|
The City of Piedmont invites community members to a groundbreaking ceremony for the new Piedmont Community Pool on Saturday, December 17th at 11am. The ceremony will be held on the grounds of the pool site at 777 Magnolia Avenue.
…………………
The Piedmont City Council voted unanimously to award a contract for construction of the new pool to Wickman Development & Construction at their December 5th, 2022 meeting.
Construction is expected to begin in early 2023, and the new pool could open as soon as summer 2024.
“It took the collective effort of hundreds to reach this point, including current and former Councilmembers, City staff, Commission and Committee volunteers, consultants, and most important – the community advocates who have tirelessly pursued the vision for an aquatics facility that truly meets Piedmont’s needs, some of whom have been working towards this goal for over two decades” said City Administrator Sara Lillevand. “I hope many community members will join us on December 17th to celebrate this monumental milestone.”
Originally opened in 1964, Piedmont’s now-shuttered pool had exceeded its useful lifespan and had long lacked adequate space to meet the community’s diverse aquatic athletic and recreational needs. Although there have been several efforts to explore feasibility of a new facility over the years, work on the pool replacement project began in earnest in 2015, with the development of the Aquatics Center Conceptual Master Plan.
This vision drew closer to reality in November 2020 with the passage of Measure UU, which authorized the sale of $19.5 million in general obligation bonds to fund the new facility. A sharp rise in construction costs beginning in 2020 further threatened the project’s feasibility, leaving a gap of more than $2 million between project cost estimates and available funds even after the City Council scaled back the original design to include only essential components.
To close the gap, the City has partnered with the Piedmont Recreational Facilities Organization (PRFO) to raise $2.1 million for the completion of the new community pool as designed. This capital campaign, which began in August 2022, looks to build on the success of previous PRFO fundraising in support of Hampton Park and the Corey Reich Tennis Center.
As of December 5th, 2022, PRFO is nearly halfway to the fundraising goal of $2.1 million. The City of Piedmont and the Piedmont City Council remain grateful to the community for their ongoing support for the new community pool project.