Mar 26 2018

The Piedmont City Council will hold a Special Study Session, open to the public, concerning standards for wireless communication facilities on April 17, 2018, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 120 Vista Avenue.

The information is intended to provide the City with a foundation on which development standards and regulations will be considered for future wireless communication facilities in the public right-of-way.

Residents are encouraged to submit questions related to the legal restrictions and the technology for wireless communication facilities in advance of the study session.

Due to the large amount of community interest in this topic, and the desire to provide the most complete and accurate information as possible, comments and questions are requested by April 9, 2018.

Residents can submit questions to cityclerk@piedmont.ca.gov. Written comments and questions will be accepted after this date, but staff may not be able to research and provide an answer by the time of the meeting.

Residents are also encouraged to share their comments at the meeting.

The April 17, 2018 study session will be televised live on KCOM-TV [Channel 27], the City’s government TV station, and will be available through streaming video on the City’s web site http://www.ci.piedmont.ca.us/video/

For more information, please visit the Wireless Communication Facilities page on the City of Piedmont’s web site at:   http://www.ci.piedmont.ca.us/publicworks/wireless.shtml

Residents with questions for staff are encouraged to contact Senior Planner Pierce MacdonaldPowell at (510) 420-3050 or via email at pmacdonald@piedmont.ca.gov.

Read the full City announcement> 2018-03-26 Council Study Session on Wireless

Mar 25 2018

“Here are some photos of PUSD board members, teachers, admin, staff, and students attending Saturday’s March for our lives in downtown Oakland.”   Randy Booker, Superintendent of the Piedmont Unified School District

Photographs showing Piedmont Unified School District teachers, administrators, Board members, and students marching for gun safety on March 24, 2018.

Click on the photos to enlarge them.

Mar 25 2018

On March 14th, 2018, the Piedmont School Board met to discuss issues related to the protests that occurred the same day in schools across the Piedmont community. The protests and student gatherings were a response to the violent events that transpired on February 14th, 2018 in Parkland Florida. Schools across the nation planned demonstrations protesting gun laws and honoring the 17 victims of the shooting.

On the proposal for the School Safety and Gun Violence Resolution 12-2017-2018, members of the Board spoke on the need to establish and perform further background checks as well as banning certain classes of firearms, to ensure the safety of students and the Piedmont community as a whole. In addition, the Board spoke on creating additional funding for the implementation of counselors and taking measures against bullying. An agreement was unanimously reached and Resolution 12-2017-2018 was approved and prepared to be sent to representatives.

Board Member Cory Smegal addressed the issue of absences for the day as many Middle and High School students skipped class to protest. Unlike middle schoolers, high schoolers at Piedmont High School were marked down with an unexcused absence.

Superintendent Randall Booker spoke to this, stating that the High School event was “student led” and made up of student leaders. In contrast, the Middle School protest was organized by the staff. For reasons of security and liability, Booker stated that although he and the Board gave their full support to students exercising their rights to free speech, they could not excuse high schoolers as students had organized the event independently from the school.

Teachers and school staff had made it clear that they were going to mark protesting students with an unexcused absence but would offer accommodation for make ups. Students should not be too worried about these absences as they are common practices when there are walkouts and protests.

Last year, I participated in Piedmont/Oakland walkout protesting the election. We were gone for an entire class period but teachers were very open to making accommodations or opportunities to make up missing work. Students’ walkouts and protests are important ways we can make ourselves heard and are necessary despite the consequences.

On the matter of free speech, members of the Board discussed the importance of students expressing their voices. This was “not a movement of disobedience [but rather] a movement of solidarity.”  The Board recognized that the High School Lie-in was not designed to be a political protest but rather an event mourning the tragic events of the Parkland shooting. High school student leaders had also organized more politically minded events during lunch the week of the 14th.

The School Board also spoke on the issue of lighting at Witter Field. PUSD Director of Alternative and Adult Education proposed the implementation of 42 light fixtures replacing the 72 light fixtures on Witter Field. This new system would provide better lighting quality, would be more energy efficient and would reduce the amount of light pollution. The Board unanimously approved the implementation of the project during the summer and the Piedmont community can expect improved lighting as soon as Fall 2018.

The School District is facing a problem where students during lunch are using the Main Park as a lunch spot but rarely clean up, leaving trash and food. I spoke to Ms Levenson, Piedmont High’s librarian who told me even the police have gotten involved, passing out littering fines to students who don’t pick up after themselves. The School Board spoke of various repercussions this could have and the possibility of closing the campus at lunch time.

by Thomas Poppas, Piedmont High School Senior

Editors Note: Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Mar 20 2018

Piedmont High School journalism students publish an online version of their newspaper, The Piedmont Highlander. 

Residents who want to read the online Highlander can click below. 

http://tphnews.com/

Mar 15 2018

The Race to be the Smartest Kid in the Room

In a town of overbearing parents and their genius children, there is a majority that is not being spoken for. The average student is being forgotten. With parents trying to propel their kids to excel in every subject, teachers want it to slow down. The name of the government body is the School Board. The purpose of their meetings is to discuss issues that affect the school. People may also bring problems to the School Board to deliberate. The School Board meeting meets every two weeks.

The major issue that was discussed at the February 28, 2018 meeting was how math classes should be compressed. There is a concern right now that the classes are being too compressed and are cramming too much information into a short amount of time. Teachers want to slow down the math classes and allow kids to digest the material. However, parents with high achieving kids think the math classes are too slow.

Allison Elvekrog spoke out saying that her child Jack was bored in Calculus AB.  She was concerned that her son was not being pushed enough in the class. However, student Hayden Stone who is in the same class felt like the class was too hard.  Hayden said that the class was challenging enough and she thought there were very few kids who were bored.

In my opinion the math classes are the hardest classes offered at Piedmont.  Math analysis was the hardest class I have ever taken at Piedmont.  I think that kids who excel at math are rare and are special circumstances.  Maybe there should be a special class for them that will allow them to excel.  I think the math classes should be less compressed and go into more detail.

In an interview with Diana Miller, she said she attended the meeting because she is invested in the Math Pathways program.  She wants to have an influence over the School Board’s decision and present her side of the story.  She said that one of the problems with the current math situation is that people are double compressing due to social pressure, which she does not think is right.  She said that she was surprised that the Board was split on the decision.  She thought they would all agree or disagree with the presentation.  She said that in two weeks the Board will come back with their decision.

by Riley Francis, Piedmont High School Senior

Editors Note: Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Mar 15 2018

Let’s Talk (About Listening)

Adults and students milled into the Piedmont Veterans’ Hall on Saturday, Feb. 10 at 8:30 in the morning. Boxes of coffee and bagels were sitting in a room adjacent to the main room and the attendees of the “Let’s Talk!” program took their turn waiting in line and smearing flavored cream cheese on bread. Less than ten minutes later, everyone was seated around one of twelve circular tables as Cheryl Wozniak introduced speaker Sara Wicht.

Sara Wicht, an educational consultant with over 20 years of experience in social justice and anti-bias education, led the “Let’s Talk!” program session with the help of Cheryl Wozniak, Director of Curriculum & Instruction. As may be indicated from the title “Let’s Talk! Building a More Inclusive Piedmont Through Deliberative Dialogue”, “Let’s Talk!” was hosted to open up discussions about diversity and, by association, identity. “Let’s Talk!” was hosted Feb. 5, 10, and 11 and it is unclear whether these sessions will be continued next year.

The major issues discussed at this meeting included identity and how it compares to others, the benefits and downfalls of race, how to respond to strong emotions, implicit bias and stereotypes, and selective attention.

Everyone participated in a set of activities and afterwards we, as table groups, discussed the deeper meaning behind the activity and then discussed the topic, such as what we consider the most important part of our identity and why.

Personally, I consider my race to be the most important part of my identity, because it is the part of me that I’ve been aware of the longest.  I also spent a couple of years grappling with what it means to be Asian, a Japanese-American, in a predominantly White school.  Now, it feels less urgent to represent Asians and be aware that I am Asian in Piedmont, but it was definitely a concept that I focused a long time on and, because of that, it is what I would consider the most important part of my identity. During the debrief, we discussed how we are not one part of our identity and that we are multi-faceted individuals, which I could not be more grateful for.

“Let’s Talk!” was a workshop that you had to sign up for to attend, which may have had some shortcomings. I think David Lindenbaum put it best when he said that “a majority of the people that are here are probably not the people who need to be here.”

Lindenbaum said that he attended the “Let’s Talk!” workshop to have a greater awareness of challenges that people of color face and how their view of the community and the world are different than his.

“I don’t know if I learned how to approach difficult subjects, because I think right now people are questioning what is fact,” said Lindenbaum. “I think this group is in the middle, open-minded.”

 Lindenbaum said having an open mind and listening to other peoples’ opinions is the way to bring positive change.

by Susan Kuroda, Piedmont High School Senior

Editors Note: Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Mar 11 2018

Piedmont School Board adopted the new Math Pathways Proposal on a 3-2 vote.

    The purpose of the Wednesday, February 28 meeting was mainly to review the new proposed Math Pathways Recommendation for the Middle School and High School, championed by the Director of Curriculum for PUSD, Dr. Cheryl Wozniak.

    The Piedmont Board of Education is composed of five elected representatives oligarchy whose purpose is to represent the interests of all students, review and approve budgets and employs all school faculty members from teachers to the Superintendent and votes on policies within the State of California’s Education Codes. Piedmont School Board usually meets on the second and fourth Wednesday of every month in the City Hall Council Chambers at 7:00.

    The major issue addressed during the meeting was this was the last hearing of the adoption of the proposed Math Pathways program. Dr. Wozniak gave a presentation on the proposed 2018-19 Math Pathways proposal. In her presentation of the now adopted proposal, she explained students in the Grade Level Compression(“GLC”), High School Compression(“HSC) and Middle School Compression(“MSC”) will have the Math Pathways program. After 5th grade math, both pathways will have completed Common Core 6-8.  When the students reach 8th grade, however for students on MSC they will have already complete IM-1. But, once they are in High School, GLC students would only take IM-1 through 3 from freshman year to junior year, leaving these students with only an option of taking Math Analysis or Statistics (“Stats”) during their Senior year with no option of taking a Calculus class.

   In HSC and MSC both pathways by the end of 10th grade students would complete IM-3 and the pathway only allows students to take either Math Analysis or Honors Math Analysis in their Junior year and in their Senior year these students will only have the choice of taking AP Calc AB(“Calc = Calculus”), AP Calc BC, Stats or Honors Stats(“H Stats”). However, for students taking AP Calc BC, Calc A would be integrated in this class.

   PHS Seniors Jeremy Wong, Jane Anderson, and Kylie Hilton were the only students from the audience who opposed the now adopted math pathways proposal.

    I strongly oppose the new adoption of the Math Pathways 2018-2019 proposal.  It is fundamentally flawed for three reasons.

  • One – What is the point of having HSC and MSC, 2 pathways, if the students when they arrive at their Senior year end up having the option to take either Calc AB, Calc BC, Stats or H Stats? In short HSC, and MSC end up at the same spot, their both really same pathway. It does not make any sense whatsoever.
  • Two – The proposal prevents and limits High School Students from taking AP math classes (AP Calc AB and BC are the only AP math classes that PHS offers) during students’ Junior year. For the class of 2018 and 2019, students who were on the old Advanced Math Pathway could take AP Calc AB during their Junior year and AP Calc BC during their Senior year.
  • Three – Since students under this proposal can not take both AP Calc AB and BC in high school and that AP Calc BC has AP Calc A already integrated within AP Calc BC, what is the point of having Calc AB. Students under this proposal would probably just take AP Calc BC because they are learning Calc A and Calc BC in the same course plus, the majority of colleges only accept calc credit if Students took the AP Calc BC test.

    We do not want to drive more students out of Piedmont because of the math program. Piedmont High School has 397 students and the senior class of 2018 only 97 students. The class of 2018 is the smallest class at PHS, and the class size has significantly decreased over the past four years. The adopted proposal will create more unnecessary stress and pressure, plus it will make it harder for the future classes to compete against students nationally and internationally when applying to colleges.

    Students and Parents were not well informed by the school of the math pathways proposal.

    I do not understand why the School Board passed an extremely flawed proposal which is detrimental to the future classes in the long run, instead of not adopting it and “assigning” the school to create a more revised proposal that gives students more autonomy when choosing their math classes.

    Before the meeting started, I interviewed MHS Senior Joshua Miller, VP of Millennium High School (MHS) who has a non-voting seat on the Board as a student representative.  Miller said to me that part of the role of the office of the VP of MHS is to address what’s going student wise in Piedmont and at Millennium as a part of the District. I asked what issues he would like addressed during the meeting. Miller said, “Well, academic wise I’m just bringing up how the quarter ends for Piedmont and marking period ends at Millennium, and activities stuff like the schools plays, the Bird Calling Contest, the community dinner and stuff that has been happening around the community.”

By Jeremy Wong,  Piedmont High School Senior

Editors Note: Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Mar 11 2018

Board Marches Toward Change

    On February 28th, Sarah Pearson, the President of the Piedmont Board of Education, opened up a discussion about change. Initially leading everyone in the Pledge of Allegiance, she stood in the center of the semi-circle table, surrounded by the four other members and the Superintendent. This was the second meeting of the month, as the Board meets bimonthly on the second and fourth Wednesdays in the Council Chambers of City Hall to discuss issues involving the School District and seek to make decisions that will improve the schools.

To start the meeting, Ms. Pearson introduced Mr. Kessler, the president of the Association of Piedmont Teachers (APT), who spoke about APT’s concern for school safety in relation to the February 14th shooting in Parkland Florida. He explained that the group had voted to declare March 14th a day of action, suggesting the possibility of letter writing to officials, moments of silence in respect for the people who died, murals, and marches. His words later prompted Board Member Doug Ireland to show his support for APT, and to voice his concern for the safety of teenagers in Piedmont and across the country.

Superintendent Randall Booker expressed his support for APT’s actions. He mentioned the nation-wide plans for showing respect to the victims of the Parkland shootings on March 14th and spoke on behalf of the School District in supporting students in taking part. He spoke of the importance of standing in unity during times like these.

Mr. Ireland spoke passionately about a couple different issues, including the mental health of students and the environment that Piedmont families create at our schools. He expressed horror at the number of students who are in states of, or who have ever been in states of, depression and at how many have contemplated suicide. Drawing connections between depression and stress, he mentioned the intense environment surrounding college that exists in Piedmont. He voiced a desire to change the level of expectations that are placed onto students as they apply and decide where to go to college.

In response to the recent resignation of the Athletic Director, a common occurrence for Piedmont High School in the past two years, he admitted that blame has to be placed on the parents and community. His assertion set the tone for the rest of the meeting: a desire for change.

Continuing with the theme of changing and improving, Dr. Cheryl Wozniak presented to the Board about past and future opportunities for members of the community to learn about diversity, inclusion, equity and other issues.

The Let’s Talk sessions have been successful, with many Associated Student Body members from the High School attending, along with other faculty and members of the community.

As expressed by Dr. Wozniak, there will be more sessions for people to attend, along with other events, including the “Unity in Community” assembly, which is organized by students. These attempts are all in the hopes of teaching people about diversity and engagement in order to fulfill new social justice standards for administrators.

Terry Montgomery spoke to the Board about measure H1, and the Board moved to accept her report.

Next, Pete Palmer presented the new Safe School Plans. The plans focus on emergency drill protocol, with the major change being the implementation of lock down drills. Amal Smith, a Board Member, spoke in favor of this change, mentioning that the frequency of fire drills has allowed students and faculty to have memorized the protocol. The Board approved the plan.

The next major item on the agenda was the issue of the new Math Pathways proposal. Dr. Wozniak also presented the proposal, explaining the changes that were being made and the many options that students will have if the proposal is passed by the Board. The changes would allow students entering high school to have the opportunity to study over the summer and then take an assessment to accelerate and take a more advanced class, for example.

Personally, I think that having so many options about math classes could be a bad thing. Students at Piedmont are constantly stressed and many take on very hard classes and have large work loads. Adding more options, and therefore more ways to seemingly get ahead or excel, will only cause the stress level of students to increase.

Math teacher, Diana Miller, later told me that she, along with others members of the Math Pathways Committee, attended the meeting to hear the information presented and the Board’s decision. The Board voted three to two in favor of the changes, which pleased Ms. Miller. The discussion was not a brief one, and had been going on for months. Ms. Miller said she was “impressed by the depth of discussion between the five Board members before the vote”, as all members thoughtfully considered what is best for the students in Piedmont.

by Zoe Adams, Piedmont High School Senior

~~~~~~~~~~~~

A Community Uniting For Change

On a rainy Wednesday evening on February 28th, School Board Members and various representatives met in City Hall to discuss pressing issues such as the Parkland shooting, the March 14th walkout, and the various proposals for new math pathways.

Twice a month on Wednesdays, the Piedmont Board of Education meets in City Hall. The five elected members from the community meet to discuss and come to conclusions on academic issues in the Piedmont Schools, deal with tough topics plaguing the town, and find a balance between the governing body of Piedmont and the residents. At the School Board meeting on February 28th, the Board predominantly discussed how the shooting in Parkland, Florida raises important conversation, and additionally, the different math pathways that will be put into effect next year.

At the beginning of the meeting, 6th grade teacher Gabriel Kessler discussed his concern, along with the other teachers and parents, about the events in Parkland. Kessler voiced his inspiration from students around the country, and stated that at a school meeting, the Board voted to declare March 14th a day of action for school safety. Additionally, Kessler reported that the march will be in favor of safety, and there should also be teach ins throughout the day to reach social justice. Lastly, Kessler made it clear that teachers like himself must model behavior for his students, as should the rest of the community.

Additionally, Superintendent Randall Booker spoke in response to Kessler, adding important points such as testing the emergency systems, drills for added preparation, and the need for everyone to speak out if they hear or see anything suspicious.

I wholeheartedly agree with Mr. Kessler and think it is imperative that action is taken to raise awareness for the events that transpired in Parkland. We must come together as a community to make our voices heard, and we must additionally come together to teach, learn, and discuss these tough issues.  In my opinion, the walk out on the 14th is a step in the right direction not just for our community, but for the nation as a whole. Students need to realize how powerful their voices are, and how small actions can make a difference on a global scale when they come together with teachers, parents, and other members of their communities.

Doug Ireland, a member of the School Board, spoke about the results of the student surveys, stating that almost all students have a teacher they feel they can go to if they need to talk. Ireland additionally voiced how hard it is to be a student, and how there is so much that is swept under the rug, including issues on drugs, alcohol, and students hurting themselves. Lastly, Ireland spoke about his concern about the Athletic Directors leaving, and how some blame can fall onto the community for this, and how we need to be more tolerable as a whole.

On the next main issue of the night, Dr. Wozniak spoke about the issue of the Math Pathways. Wozniak explained that there are four different options available, but they are all about compression. Additionally, it was noted that one purpose of the new pathways are so that students who never reach Calculus are not penalized by colleges for the pathway they take. This is an important issue because students should take the courses suited for them without having to worry about any negative consequences. There was additionally talk about adopting a new Middle School compression pathway; this way the school can truly uproot the old ways to make way for the new. Wozniak also stressed the idea of adopting a calculus path that matches the design of College Board courses as well.

Many spoke out from the audience about the proposed Math Pathways, a few stating that they very much value the simplicity of the original pathways, and stressed that the new ways can lead to students missing the integral basics that they would not be able to grasp in the new, compressed courses.

After the meeting, I spoke with Piedmont High School Principal, Adam Littlefield, about the issues presented throughout the evening.

Mr. Littlefield explained that he tries to attend the School Board meetings when they pertain to items that relate to the High School. Additionally, Mr. Littlefield stated that he attended the meeting on Wednesday because he wanted to be there to answer any questions regarding the new Math Pathways and the emergency plans being put into place.

Mr. Littlefield expressed his pleasure with the results of the meeting, due to the reasoning that both items were approved by the Board. He did not voice any concerns, however, because most potentials questions get addressed before he attends the meetings.

by Bella Oglesby, Piedmont High School Senior 
 Editors Note:  Opinions expressed are those of the authors.
Mar 6 2018

Many public City meetings are broadcast live via the City website at > http://www.ci.piedmont.ca.us/video/ or on Cable Channel 27.  These meetings can be viewed after the meetings from video recordings found on the City website.  Many other meetings are not broadcast requiring those interested in the subject matter to be physically present to observe the meetings.

Below are a list of the City’s selection of which meetings in March 2018 will or will not be recorded and broadcast.

BROADCAST:

  • City Council March 5 meeting video can be found > HERE.
  • Wednesday March 7  Park Commission 5:30 pm Chambers
  • Monday March 12 Planning Commission 5:00 pm Chambers
  • Monday March 19 City Council 7:30 pm Chambers
  • Wednesday March 21 Recreation Commission 7:30 pm Chambers

MEETINGS NOT BROADCAST:

  • Tuesday  March 6  CIP Review Committee 7:00 pm Conference Room – (CIP Committee deliberates on which capital projects to recommend for funding by the City Council. This is an expense related committee.)
  • Thursday March 15 City Council Special Meeting 5:30 pm Conference Room Interviews of applicants for Commission and Committee Appointments. (Open to everyone but seldom observed by Piedmonters.)
  • Tuesday March 20 City / School Liaison 4:00 pm Conference Room (Representatives from the City Council and School Board discuss subjects of mutual interest as safety, facilities, etc. and return to their respective bodies to share information. Meeting is open to the public.)
  • Tuesday March 20 CIP Review Committee 7:00 pm Conference Room ( Deliberations continue on funding choices. This is an expense related committee. )
  • Thursday March 29 Public Safety Committee 5:30 pm Chambers.

All public meetings are open to the public to observe and participate. Exception: Closed Sessions.

Agendas for meetings will be posted in City Hall and the Piedmont Police Department at least 72 hours prior to each meeting.  Agendas for some Council, Commission & appointed Committee meetings are also posted online on the City website http://www.ci.piedmont.ca.us/ Copies of all agendas may be requested from the office of the City Clerk, John O. Tulloch, 120 Vista Avenue, Piedmont or by calling 510-420-3040.

Notice and agendas of special meetings will be provided by the City at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting.

Feb 28 2018

    On January 23rd, the Piedmont School Board reviewed the productivity of the Common Core program according to current Piedmont math teachers feedback and suggestions.

    The Piedmont School Board is composed of five elected members of the community whose purpose is to balance the interests of all members of the community in approving budgets, employing Piedmont Unified School District (PUSD) faculty, and shaping the academic vision for the local schools. Typically, the Board meets the second and fourth Wednesday of each month, starting at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in City Hall. The purpose of their meeting on Tuesday, January 23 was to review the evaluations of the Common Core curriculum by PUSD math teachers.

    At the top of the agenda was the integration of the Common Core curriculum into the PUSD.  Dr. Cheryl Wozniak, the Director of Curriculum for PUSD, spent the last week discussing how the schools, elementary to high school, can improve the math programs with current math teachers. One of the key takeaways from the faculty was that there must be more time spent on the goals of Common Core because students have no clue what they are.

    In her presentation, Dr. Wozniak also discussed the next steps in evaluating the program, citing a meeting on Monday, January 29 at 7:00 PM for questions by community members about the proposed changes. One of the proposals was for each course to be analyzed and determine how much content is teachable in one school year. The goal with this is to meet all the standards required by the state program, and district. Official proposals were released via email a few days prior, so she only touched on the feedback from teachers and their suggestions in remedying the faults in the curriculum.

    As a senior outside of the Common Core system, it is difficult to assess the Common Core program when its goals seem  foreign to those of us in more traditional math classes. The names of Common Core classes (for example, IM1, Compressed IM2, etc) give no clue as to what students will be learning in the school year, in comparison to my clearly defined classes with names such as Calculus AB or Statistics. My understanding of Common Core curriculum is that it strives for depth of knowledge and rigor but beyond that, I do not see how it differs from any other math class. When asking a freshman at Piedmont High School and in Common Core, he reiterated my confusion saying “I have been in the Common Core program since 7th grade and I still don’t even know what the goals are”.

    At the end of the meeting, I met with Cory Smegal, one of the five sitting Board members, to hear her take on the next steps that the Board will be taking in judging the Common Core curriculum. Ms. Smegal said “Dr. Wozniak has a parent meeting scheduled for next week which I plan on attending where she will put forth the recommended tweaks to the math pathways”. She further explained that “[the school] isn’t making large scale changes to my understanding, but there will be some tweaks”. When asked about how else the Board plans to involve the community in the decision process, she quickly responded, saying “I would also love to hear more from students” because they bring a crucial perspective to the issues presented.

    All in all, discussions will be continued in assessing their proficiency — these conversations to be had within the schools faculty, administrators, and community.

By Madeline Levine, Piedmont High School Senior

 ~~~~~~~~~

The Ideal Environment For Educating –

    During the Piedmont School Board Meeting on January 23rd, School Board members discussed the importance of educating our children. Members of the School Board meet twice a month, and are responsible for approving all policies, administrative regulations, and donations. One of the questions they are trying to answer is: How can we incorporate and create learning material that is both challenging and interesting to students? Another concern they are addressing is how to create policies that establish and ensure a healthy learning environment for students and teachers.

    The meeting’s main discussion focused on how to change our education system to make learning the best experience for all students. There is so much competition when it comes to schools and education, however, the majority of parents are concerned that the quick pace of classes is preventing kids from gaining depth.

     The middle school teachers’ surveys reported that they need to incorporate more challenging questions and projects to make math more interesting. Then the board discussed the importance of communicating with parents about depth of content vs. speed of content. Overall, their objective is to balance the need to challenge students with the importance of experiencing both the breadth and depth of the courses.

    According to both middle school and high school teachers, math seems to be more for the purpose of getting admitted into college and not for the benefit of learning. For example, teachers expressed that from their viewpoint it makes sense to eliminate one of the AP Calculus classes because the reason that the majority of students take these courses is for the purpose of college admissions. Teachers also showed support for compression in middle school math as opposed to skipping 6th grade math entirely. However, teachers want the opportunity to further analyze the material of the compressed courses and the amount of content they are able to teach. Often students in compression have to go quickly through the content, due to the fast pace structure of the curriculum, losing the depth of the content.

    Another main focus was on the kind of support that can be brought to schools. The Board discussed the importance of the Teen Health Survey and reviewing certain policies. The policies they are in the process of reviewing are Complaining Against Sexual Harassment in the Workplace, Reporting Child Abuse and Neglect, Process on Expulsion and Suspension, Hazing, Bullying, and Hate Crimes. They are also planning on creating a Board policy for teachers’ social media.

     Another important topic evaluated was the constant shift in behavioral rules and what is considered acceptable behavior. The School Board recognizes these shifts and aims to do their best to fit the expectations of parents and students, however, it is challenging to make perfect policies. The School Board also plans to make policies more accessible to parents and encourages student participation in editing the policies.

    The president’s of PAINTS and MAKERS spoke to the School Board and informed them about their goal to increase participation and their decision to join forces when applying to grant programs.

    Cheryl Wozniak delivered the results of the Student and Parent Surveys, as well as the Teacher Surveys. She presented the takeaways and new objectives towards improving education and the learning environment. She expressed the teachers’ hopes to fix the pace of the material, so that kids can fully retain the content of the material. A parent from the audience, spoke about how she hopes that the revised content in math classes will make both her kids more interested and engaged.

    I think that going into depth of content in a math course is more valuable than taking quicker paced math classes in order to reach the most challenging math courses offered. Personally, I think it is harder to absorb and master the information when classes are fast paced. Often material is based off of material learned in previous units, therefore, if a student hasn’t mastered the previous material it can be harder to learn the material from the next unit. Math can be a very competitive subject, so students may enter an advanced math class that they are not entirely prepared for.

   Later, Superintendent Randall Booker educated the School Board about their new event “Let’s Talk Building a More Inclusive Piedmont,” an event where interactions between colleagues, empty nesters, students, and any other members of Piedmont are prompted. He also addressed the concern for improved sexual harassment prevention in schools and the importance of creating a strong foundation. He expressed the need to support students and staff and create concrete rules concerning exposure to power and specific language. He argued how crucial it is to construct a healthy balance for students and at the same time give them power. The Board intends to increase staff collaboration, including training and conversations. Teachers are planning to receive training over the summer with facilitators, instead of taking online training. Also the Superintendent stressed the need to continue reviewing and editing policies referring to these issues.

    I interviewed Doug Ireland, who is a member of the School Board. Originally what inspired him to run for his position five years ago was that the superintendent was retiring and he wanted to help find another one. Another reason he ran was because “Common Core curriculum was being introduced and he thought there would be resistance in our community,” however, it was a new State policy and a requirement (Ireland). His biggest concern now is with behavior within the School District. There have been issues of racism, harassment, and potential violence and there is no perfect way to solve it.

by Megan Aikawa, Piedmont High School Senior

Editors Note: Opinions expressed are those of the authors.