Oct 7 2020

We are writing in enthusiastic support of Conna McCarthy for Piedmont City Council.

Conna’s life has been steeped in public service in every aspect of her life and, for years, she has volunteered her talents to Piedmont’s education and civic communities. She is intelligent, capable, direct, and deeply principled.

Conna knows Piedmont and our city has benefitted time and again from her expertise, interest, energy, and time. The breadth of her knowledge and experience, her on-going commitment, and her candid approach will continue to serve us.

Please join us in voting for Conna for City Council.

Respectfully, Amal & Rick Smith

Editors Note: Opinions expressed are those of the authors.
Oct 7 2020

        It is long past time for Piedmont to rebuild our one and only community pool.

Current residents of Piedmont have benefitted from the generosity of prior residents who built, paid for, and in many cases donated our buildings, parks, playfields and of course, the pool.  Their generosity toward future generations has allowed us, as taxpayers, to focus our collective resources on our excellent public schools.

It is now our turn to step up to rebuild our failing infrastructure. The two measures on the ballot in November are about repairing and replacing what is broken. Measure UU will allow Piedmont to issue, for the first time ever, municipal bonds to rebuild the failing 56-year-old Piedmont Pool.  Municipal bonds are like a 30-year fixed-rate community mortgage, repaid through property tax assessments.  Measure TT will align the real property transfer tax – only paid when a home is bought or sold – to match those of Berkeley and Oakland, and use the funds to repair and maintain our city facilities and failing roads and sidewalks.

To us, six former Piedmont Mayors, the focus on long-term planning is a sign of pragmatic and strategic thinking.  The current City Council unanimously placed Measures UU and TT on the ballot because our failing infrastructure can’t wait.  Spending more to repair a crumbling pool facility makes no fiscal sense. Borrowing money at low interest rates to rebuild a necessary civic asset is the prudent decision.

Soon the City Council will be forced to make the decision that no one wants to make: to permanently close the Piedmont Pool. If Measure UU does not pass, Piedmont will then fail to provide a basic public amenity that every other city in Alameda County provides to its residents. Whether you swim or not, the lack of a municipal pool would be a profound loss for our community and our schools.

Please join us in supporting the future of Piedmont and voting yes on Measures UU and TT.

Dean Barbieri

Michael Bruck

John Chiang

Abe Friedman

Susan Hill

Valerie Matzger

Editors Note: Opinions expressed are those of the authors.
Oct 7 2020
I have known Veronica Thigpen for several years. We first met through the Piedmont Appreciating Diversity Committee.  I was impressed that she stepped up to lead the MLK Day celebration and gathering as a new member of the organization and of our community. The two MLK Day events she organized and led were extremely successful.  They were standing-room only and the program not only celebrated the work and vision of Martin Luther King Jr., it grounded the ideas of racial justice and equity within our community.
.
Personally, I appreciated her dedication to opening the MLK  events with a recognition that we were on land which once belonged to the indigenous people of the East Bay, the Ohlone.  To me this showed her commitment to the inclusion of the diverse people that live and work in our community.
.
I am voting for Veronica for the school board because I believe that she will take the initiative, leadership and dedication that she demonstrated through those events together with her focus on equity and inclusion and use those to lead education in Piedmont in the direction it needs to go.
.
Please join me in voting for Veronica Thigpen.
.
Shanti Brien, Piedmont Resident
Editors Note:  Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Oct 7 2020

No Consumer Ever Got a “Prop. 13 Discount”

Since Prop. 13 was passed in 1978, the taxable value of California business property has increased no more than 2% per year regardless of its market value, unless there is a change in ownership.  Owners of such properties have used various legal mechanisms to avoid a change in ownership.  These owners, whether operating a business or renting property to others, pay far less property tax than competing businesses that acquired property more recently.

Prices and rents, however, are set by markets.  Consumers and renters don’t get a “Prop. 13 discount” that reflects the property owner’s low property tax; the property owner just pockets those savings while the rest of us pay not only the market price, but also more in all kinds of taxes to make up for the lost business property tax revenue.

Prop. 15, on the November ballot, will fix this situation by allowing the taxable value of business properties worth more than $3 million to gradually rise to market value.  Opponents claim that Prop. 15 will cause prices and rents to rise as property owners try to pass along the increased property tax.  That’s extremely unlikely—if those property owners could charge more, they already would be.

Please vote in favor of Prop. 15 to require all businesses to pay their fair share and fund our schools.

Richard W. Raushenbush, Former School Board Member

Oct 5 2020
I oppose Measure TT, the thirty-five percent increase in the Real Property Transfer Tax (“RPTT”), as  Measure TT is fundamentally flawed.
.
Proponents claim the city faces a “maintenance deficit” and this is based on the city’s assumption that RPTT revenue will remain flat at $2.8M for the next 10 years.  The data reveals that over the past 10 years the tax revenue has already averaged $3.3M annually. A conservative projection shows by 2030 the RPTT will be $4.4M. Despite  expected volatility Piedmont’s RPTT revenue will continue to grow because of rising Piedmont home prices, consistent sales volume and macro-economic forces.
.
Measure TT is proposed as needed for facility maintenance and repair; the text of Measure TT allows taxpayer dollars to be used for any City service. If a tax is needed for facilities, then it should be written that way. Further, Piedmonters are already taxed at high levels by our City services and sewer taxes.  Additionally, our School tax is the highest in the State and School bonds are at the maximum legal limit. Our total City and School financial burden is at the highest State wide level. Keeping City taxes at a reasonable level allows more generous volunteer contributions to our Schools which makes future school tax increases unnecessary and supports the many retired seniors on fixed incomes.
.
All City long-term needs including sewer replacement, equipment replacement and pension obligations are stable.  Plainly at this time, there is no reason to permanently raise the transfer tax.
.
Vote no on Measure TT.
.
Rick Schiller, Piedmont Resident
Editors Note: Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Oct 5 2020
WHAT ABOUT THOSE OTHER CAPITAL PROJECTS?
.
Supporting Measure UU seems like a “mom and apple pie” decision, but according to the most recent Budget Advisory Committee report the City has an additional $52 Million in capital needs for which there is no plan. Importantly, the list includes seismic retrofitting of our police, fire and Veterans buildings.
.
When people are asked why they choose to live in Piedmont, public safety services are high on the list.  It appears that the pool bonds are being proposed without reference to the larger context of all needed capital projects. Why has the pool been given the highest priority?  Why has there apparently not been a systematic prioritization among all capital needs?
.
If the pool bonds are issued, will that minimize the City’s ability to obtain additional financing for these other important needs? Might the pool bonds make residents less likely to approve another bond?
.
With Piedmont being among the most highly taxed of comparable cities, we cannot assume that Piedmont’s residents could afford still another bond or that the City could take on additional debt while retaining its credit rating.  The City’s Q and A’s on Measure UU makes no mention of this context.
.
Kathleen Quenneville, Piedmont Resident
Editors Note: Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Oct 5 2020

The City offers the following information and referrals:

On Tuesday, November 3rd, there will be a Statewide / City of Piedmont General Election, which includes election of two seats on the Piedmont City Council and three seats on the Board of Education as well as elections for President of the United States, United States Representative, Assemblymember, and other offices. Also on the ballot are several statewide measures, several special district measures, and two City of Piedmont measures.

To see a personalized voter pamphlet and find out the location of your polling place, please visit the Registrar of Voters My Voter Profile page. For more information on how this election will be different than in a non-pandemic year, please see the GO! Page on the Registrar of Voters web site.

Voter Registration

The last day to register to vote for the November 3rd election is Monday, October 19th. Provisional registration is available on Election day. Voter registration forms are available at the City Clerk’s Office and the Registrar of Voters Office. Online voter registration is available at http://registertovote.ca.gov/

Vote By Mail Election

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this will be an entirely vote by mail election. Each registered voter in the city will be mailed a vote by mail ballot. Mailing will begin on Monday, October 5th.

Voters may drop Vote By Mail ballots in to the secure ballot box located on Highland Way near the mailboxes 24 hours a day up to and including Election Day. Click to view a map of the Ballot Drop Boxes in Alameda County. Voters may also turn in Vote By Mail ballots to any Accessible Voting Location in Alameda County on Election Day.

The Veterans’ Memorial Building will serve as an Accessible Voting Location for this election. Any resident of Alameda County can come to the Veterans’ Hall and cast their ballot or drop off their vote by mail ballot. The nearly 100 accessible voting locations throughout Alameda County will be open from October 31st through Election Day, November 3rd. Click to view a complete list of the Accessible Voting Locations for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Sample Ballot / Voter Information Pamphlet

The Alameda County Registrar of Voters began mailing Sample Ballot / Voter Information Pamphlets to registered voters on Thursday, September 24th. You can also view your personalized Voter Information Guide on the  Registrar of Voters My Voter Profilepage. If you have not received your sample ballot by October 16th, please contact the Alameda County Registrar of Voters Office at (510) 272-6933.

Measures TT and UU

At its regular meeting on August 3, 2020, the City Council placed two measures on the ballot. The first proposes an increase to the existing Real Property transfer Tax. The second would authorize the sale of bonds to fund the construction of a new community pool.

Please see the Ballot Measure Information page on the City’s web site for more information.

Election Workers Needed

The Alameda County Registrar of Voters is seeking election workers for the November 3rd Election. If you are interested in being a election worker, please visit the Registrar of Voters Election Worker page. The Registrar is especially seeking bilingual election workers.

General Information

If you have any questions regarding your voter registration, your sample ballot, or your polling place location, please contact the Alameda County Registrar of Voters Office at (510) 272-6933.

Oct 5 2020

The League of Women Voters of Piedmont Board, composed of both Piedmonters and non-Piedmonters, voted to endorse Piedmont’s Measures TT and UU.  The Piedmont League, a non-partisan political organization, supported the measures without hearing from both proponents and opponents.  The League’s Board has sole authority on endorsing Piedmont ballot measures.  The League’s general membership is not involved in the endorsement of ballot measures.  

__________

The press release linked below was prepared by the Piedmont League of Women Voters on their Pros and Cons of Measures TT (Tax increase on property sales) and UU (Pool bonds for new municipal pools). 

Pros and Cons TT and UU 2020

Editors Note: Opinions expressed are those of the League of Women Voters of Piedmont.
Oct 4 2020

“It’s legal theft of your equity.”

East Bay Times October 2, 2020

The following submitted article was in the East Bay Times newspaper.

Read the whole article here. or below.

Editorial: Don’t let these Bay Area cities take more of your home equity

Sep 29 2020

The following information from the City of Piedmont website was submitted by Measure UU Pool Bond supporters. 

__________

Below are answers to frequently asked questions regarding Measure UU, which, if approved, would authorize the issuance of general obligation bonds to replace the Piedmont Community Pool.

1. The City proposes to issue $19.5 Million in bonds. What is the actual expected borrowing interest rate assuming the bond passes this year? 

Municipal bonds can be issued in stages as the funds are needed, and the applicable interest rate is determined at the time the bonds are issued.  As a frame of reference, the interest rate as of September 16, 2020 is 2.8%.

2. What is the City’s current total outstanding general obligation debt?

The City currently has no outstanding general obligation debt.

3. What is the term of the bond repayment?

Measure UU provides that the term of the bond repayment is 30 years with a fixed interest rate.

4. How long will the tax be imposed on properties, and will the amount of the tax ever decrease?

Measure UU, if adopted, would impose a tax on properties for 30 years.  In the event our property tax roll increases at 3.5% per year (10 year average is ~4.5%), the tax rate per $1,000 of assessed value will drop from $0.26 (if all bonds are issued) to approximately $0.10 in thirty years. The total tax assessed would still be the same, but redistributed based on the individual property assessment.

5. How can a property owner ascertain the assessed value of property?

Each year, the Alameda County Assessor’s Office notifies all property owners of the property’s annual assessed value. This number can also be found on a property owner’s property tax bill. Residents can ascertain the assessed value of their home on the Alameda County Assessor’s web site

6. How does Measure UU impact the City’s General Fund?

Measure UU does not have an impact on the City’s General Fund.

7. What is the proposed concept for replacing the existing pool?

In the event Measure UU is adopted, the exact design of the pool facility will be finalized through a public process. The current proposed concept to replace the existing pool is the establishment of two pools: (1) a warmer, shallower recreation pool with areas for safe water play, swim lessons, therapeutic swim, and physical rehabilitation, and (2) a wider and deeper pool for recreation, physical education, water aerobics, water polo, swim team, and lap swimming.  Each pool would be larger than the current “medium” and “big” pools.

8. What are the estimated costs of the project compared to bond revenues and what steps will the City take to limit project costs to available bond revenues?

The measure would authorize the City to issue bonds with a principal value that does not exceed $19.5 million. In the event the City receives an AA+ bond rating, it is conceivable the bonds would be sold at a premium and Measure UU would provide revenues in excess of the face value of the bonds. The City determined that the $19.5 million figure was appropriate based on rough “hard cost” estimates as follows: $8 million for the two pools to replace the current “medium” and “big” pools, $3.5 million for site preparation, and $6 million for a building to house the pool equipment, restrooms, offices, and community space.  If necessary, the concept can be value-engineered during final design development to meet the budget parameters.

9. Can the City repair the existing pool?

The City has determined that repairing the existing pool is not a feasible option.  The City has been continuously repairing the existing pool since it took over operations in 2011. The repairs required to keep the facility safe and operational have become increasingly expensive every year, and the facility is now at the point where pool decks need to be removed in order to address structural issues. A renovation of the existing facility would require not only major structural repair and equipment replacement, but would also trigger significant site work required to meet current health, safety, and accessibility regulations.

10. What oversight is in place to ensure that the bond funds are used properly?

Measure UU provides that a bond oversight committee be appointed to make sure the bonds are issued and spent in accordance with the terms of Measure UU. As with any project, staff and the City Council will also work to ensure proper use of public funds. The project will also be subject to the City’s project risk management policy.

Editors Note: Opinions expressed are those of the City of Piedmont and Measure UU supporters.