OPINION: Council Time Change Should Maintain Teleconference of Public Meetings
Agenda item for January 17, 2023 – >council-agenda 1.17.23
Staff report:
“Consideration of a Change to the Regular Meeting Time of the City Council to 6:00 p.m.”
RECOMMENDATION
By motion, approve changing the start time of regular City Council meetings from 7:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. and authorize the City Clerk to amend all documents which refer to this time.
BACKGROUND
State law and the City Charter require the City Council to hold regular meetings at a set time, place, and date to ensure the public’s ability to participate in city government decisions. Currently, by resolution, the City Council’s regular meetings are scheduled for the 1st and 3rd Mondays of the month at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
Shortly after the beginning of the pandemic, the Council temporarily adjusted the start of its meetings to 6:00 p.m. to better accommodate the changed work environments of the community, Councilmembers and staff. This change has continued for the duration of the pandemic and received compliments from the community. Staff is recommending that it be made permanent.
Should Council approve this change, staff will update the appropriate documents and publicize the new time.
By: John O. Tulloch, Assistant City Administrator / City Clerk”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The time change is a good idea IF City Council maintains the current teleconference access to all public meetings so the public can participate in meetings and comment remotely. If not, this time change would reduce community participation in public meetings. The 6:00 time is not optimal for in-person attendance, and it appears the pandemic is not going away.
The traditional 7:30 meeting time was intended to accommodate the family dinner hour and help with homework, late SF commuters and councilmember work schedules. A 6:00 start time will conflict with much of that but if the public has teleconference access to all city meetings, it can juggle those commitments and still participate in meetings.
Council direction on continuing to teleconference public meetings appears later on Monday’s agenda which is unfortunate. It would be a more fruitful discussion to have both issues addressed in the same agenda item. Staff understandably wants the 6:00 start time but that will interfere with prime family time. A 7:00 start time might be more attractive to younger community members who want to participate in meetings and potentially serve on Council.
Being on the Consent Calendar, this item won’t be open for public discussion unless a councilmember or member of the public requests that it be taken off the Calendar. That can be done by attending the start of the meeting at 6:00 and requesting this item be pulled from the Consent Calendar.
Attend the Council meeting via Zoom: https://cdn5-hosted.
civiclive.com/UserFiles/ Servers/Server_13659739/File/ Government/City%20Council/ Agenda/council-current-agenda. pdf?v=5Zo1Ykv8r&v=5Zo1Ykv8r Whatever time the Council selects, hopefully it will stay in the 21st century and maintain public participation in all city meetings through teleconference.
Garrett Keating, Former Member of the Piedmont City Council
Garrett, 6pm is worse if the pandemic is over, because that means more people are back in offices.
I agree, however, the time change is OK if remote access is maintained.
Agreed – 7:00 made more sense but when this item was put on the consent calendar with no acknowledgement of community needs, the writing was on the wall.
One step the council could take is to schedule voting items early on the agenda and information items later on the agenda. Plus give more than 72 hours of public notice for meeting agendas.