Oct 30 2017

On October 30, 2017, at a Special Council meeting with all council members present, the Council voted unanimously to approve all 3 proposed cell facility sites.

Numerous written comments had been sent to the council members prior to the Special Meeting.  Suggested reasons for Council denial of  the applications included: noise, safety, health concerns, potential harm to trees, aesthetic issues, disruptive maintenance requirements, lack of information on coverage and capacity.

McBain and Rood expressed their concurrence with the staff and attorney’s advice to conditionally approve the installations.  The other three council members indicated less enthusiasm for approval.

After listening to residents, applicants, council members, and the staff in the full Council Chamber, Council member Tim Rood made the motions to approve each of the applicant’s proposed sites.  Hearing no seconds to the motions to approve, Mayor Bob McBain seconded all of the motions for the three sites.

Vice Mayor Teddy King stated it had been her most difficult issue in her 10 years of public service.  However, based on the City’s legal advisement of a potential lawsuit costing $250,000, she felt responsible in saving money, thus she supported approval.

Council members Jennifer Cavenaugh and Betsy Andersen asked many questions and in the end reluctantly voted for approval.

The approval includes requiring the applicant and contractors to meet a number of conditions, one of which is to prove compliance with Piedmont’s noise ordinance prior to construction.

The approved sites are:

1. Site PHS01, a WCF proposed across from 340-370 Highland Avenue;

2. Site PHS03, a WCF proposed at 799 Magnolia Avenue; and

3. Site PHS04, a WCF proposed across from 740 Magnolia Avenue.

Read the prior PCA article on the communication facilities and the staff report recommending approval HERE.

Oct 28 2017

Special Council meeting to consider 3 sites for Wireless Communication facilities. 

Monday, October 30, 7:30 p.m., City Hall. 

AGENDA SUBJECT: Consideration of Applications for Wireless Communication Facilities Permits and Variances submitted by Crown Castle NG West LLC through Beacon Development as well as a determination of CEQA Exemption under CCR 15303(d) as follows (continued from 10/16/17): a. PHS01 – Across from 340 – 370 Highland Ave., PHS03 – 799 Magnolia Ave., and PHSo4 – Across from 740 Magnolia Ave.

City Administrator Paul Benoit’s  RECOMMENDATION:

A. Approve, subject to standard and special conditions, the applications for wireless communication facilities (WCF) permit at the following three sites by adopting the three resolutions included in Attachment A, pages 7-45 of this report:

1. Site PHS01, a WCF proposed across from 340-370 Highland Avenue;

2. Site PHS03, a WCF proposed at 799 Magnolia Avenue; and

3. Site PHS04, a WCF proposed across from 740 Magnolia Avenue.

Read the full staff report including the recommended conditions of approval below >

http://www.ci.piedmont.ca.us/html/govern/staffreports/2017-10-30/crown-castle-applications.pdf

COUNCIL CONTACT INFORMATION

Robert McBain, Mayor rmcbain@piedmont.ca.gov (510) 547-0597  
Teddy Gray King, Vice Mayor tking@piedmont.ca.gov (510) 450-0890  
Jennifer Cavenaugh jcavenaugh@piedmont.ca.gov    
Tim Rood trood@piedmont.ca.gov (510) 239-7663  
Betsy Smegal Andersen bandersen@piedmont.ca.gov
Oct 27 2017

We are writing to let you know that Piedmont High School history teacher Mark Cowherd has resigned.

A complaint against Mr. Cowherd was filed earlier this year by recent Piedmont High School graduates.  The District took the complaint very seriously, thoroughly investigated the allegations, and concluded that Mr. Cowherd engaged in inappropriate and unprofessional conduct.  The District instituted disciplinary and corrective action and cannot legally disclose any further details.

Mr. Cowherd was on leave during the investigation and, after it was concluded, returned to his teaching position.  At this week’s School Board meeting, a number of community members expressed outrage about his continuing role in the District.  We appreciate the courage and conviction of the students who shared their experiences, everyone who participated in the meeting, as well as those who shared their views through calls and emails to District staff and school board members.

On Thursday morning, our administrators spoke with all high school students to reaffirm our commitment to supporting their social, emotional and academic well-being:

  • The Wellness Center is a safe and confidential space to talk about questions, concerns, or feelings about this or any issue.
  • The academic counselors are available to talk about schoolwork concerns, as well as social and emotional issues.
  • Dr. Cheryl Wozniak, the District’s Title IX Coordinator, is available to all students to discuss and address concerns about discrimination, harassment, or violence of any kind among students or staff.
  • Middle and high school students may use the District’s “Speak Up!” form for filing signed or anonymous complaints. The Uniform Complaint form is available for all students and parents who wish to file a formal complaint, which necessitates an investigation and follow up.
  • We will continue to bring speakers, embed curriculum and improve policies to encourage students to advocate for themselves and develop social courage.

In addition to supporting our students however we can, we are working to identify qualified substitute and permanent teachers for the affected history classes and to assist seniors with pending letters of recommendation for their college applications.

We recognize that these events have deeply impacted our community. With this community’s support, we will help our students through this transition and will encourage them to use their voices for themselves and for each other.

As always, if you have questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact the school board or superintendent.

Respectfully,

Randall Booker, RBooker@piedmont.k12.ca.us
Sarah Pearson, SPearson@piedmont.k12.ca.us
Amal Smith, Amalsmith@piemdont.k12.ca.us
Doug Ireland, DIreland@piedmont.k12.ca.us
Cory Smegal, CSmegal@piedmont.k12.ca.us
Andrea Swenson, ASwenson@piedmont.k12.ca.us

Randall Booker
Superintendent
Oct 27 2017

The City Announces a Recreation Commission Vacancy

A vacancy has occurred on the Recreation Commission, as Betsy Andersen was recently appointed to the City Council.  Piedmont voters, who are interested in serving on the Commission, may download the > Application for Appointive Vacancy and read the > Commission Description of Duties.

Applications are due to City Hall on or before the deadline of Wednesday, November 15, 2017.

Interviews with the City Council for this appointed position will be scheduled for the evening of Monday, November 20, 2017. No appointment will be made without a Council interview.

For further information contact City Clerk John Tulloch at 420-3040.

Oct 27 2017

TRUNK OR TREAT !

BRING THE KIDS TO greet Piedmont’s

POLICE OFFICERS

and TRICK-OR-TREAT out of the trunk of a patrol car.
WHERE: Piedmont Police Department

Highland and Vista Avenues
When: Halloween, Tuesday October 31, 2017

Time: 3 – 6 p.m.

 

Oct 26 2017

School District found Cowherd “acted inappropriately and unprofessionally in his conduct as a certificated employee for the District.”

On Wednesday, October 25, 2017, at their meeting in City Hall, the Piedmont Board of Education was met by outraged parents demanding correction of what they considered to be inappropriate behavior by Piedmont High history teacher Mark Cowherd.

There were calls for Cowherd’s immediate firing based on a long term problem of sexual harassment, inappropriate jokes and actions. Attractive females were frequently found to be targets for Cowherd. One parent from the District Attorney’s Office stated the District should remove Cowherd and stand up to any lawsuit.

Emotions ran high as the packed Chamber’s attendees applauded long and loud after each speaker described the issues. The poor example set by Cowherd was felt to be totally unacceptable as well as a negative influence on the youth of Piedmont.

During a closed session of the Piedmont School Board on September 20 teacher Mark Cowherd’s evaluation by the Piedmont Unified School District was considered.  No action was taken during that meeting according to District Superintendent Randall Booker and as reflected in the public record of the meeting.

Channel 5 KPIX covered Cowherd concerns with an interview of Superintendent Booker.  View it HERE.

The East Bay Times reported on the Board meeting of October 25, 2017 when the organized effort by parents during the Communications and Announcements segment of the meeting informed the School Board of their serious concerns.   (See report HERE.)

Mark Cowherd has taught Advanced Placement United States and European history courses for many years at Piedmont High School, and he has long been a controversial teacher.   Revered by many students, some of whom went to the September 20 Special Meeting to defend Cowherd, and greatly disliked by others, who considered his behavior toward students and his remarks made in the classroom to be inappropriate.

In the past, parents and students have written letters to administrators, the School Board, and other parents, expressing concern over Cowherd’s behaviors: many thought their voices were not heard.  Some students and parents have indicated fear of retaliation with lower grades or no college recommendations for the high level advanced classes Cowherd teaches.

The administration, although informed of concerns, has consistently allowed Cowherd to continue teaching, and “welcomed him back” following a disciplinary three week leave of absence.

Parents and students have been aware for “at least five years” about Cowherd’s inappropriate behaviors, yet Cowherd has continued to teach within the District.

President of the School Board, Sarah Pearson, noted documentation of inappropriate behavior by District employees was needed by the School District.  She welcomed communications to the Board.

Some have questioned Cowherd’s exclusive European student trips that are unauthorized by the School District. 

For years, during Winter Break, Cowherd has led self-initiated and self-sponsored trips to Europe exclusively for his AP European History students.  Each student pays their own way, presumably their costs cover Cowherd’s travel costs as well.  Although his trips are not under the auspices of the School District, the facilities of the District and student information are used to develop the trips. For instance, the orientation and recruitment of student travelers has been conducted in the High School, yet the District provides no legal protections or oversight for the trips.

Update 10/27/17: Superintendent Randall Booker places Cowherd on a second leave of absence.  Read the report HERE.

POLICE DEPARTMENT CONTACT;

Dispatcher 420 -3000

Police Chief Jeremy Bowers  jbowers@piedmontpd.or

420 – 3011

 

SCHOOL BOARD CONTACT INFORMATION:

Sarah Pearson
President
spearson@piedmont.k12.ca.us

Amal Smith
Vice President
amalsmith@piedmont.k12.ca.us

Doug Ireland
direland@piedmont.k12.ca.us

Cory Smegal
csmegal@piedmont.k12.ca.us

Andrea Swenson
aswenson@piedmont.k12.ca.us

To view the COMMUNICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENT segment of the online video of the meeting go to http://piedmont.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=1680

To read and learn more about Mark Cowherd go to: > http://www.ratemyteachers.com/mark-cowherd/947515-t

Oct 25 2017

While Riders Focus on Maintenance, Safety and Comfort Problems, BART Will Pursue Fare Evaders

The BART Board will hear reports from Board members on the maintenance, safety and other issues in the stations of their districts (Agenda Item 8 A) on Thursday, October 26. The public is invited to attend the 5 pm Board meeting in the Kaiser Mall, 344 20th Street, Oakland, on the third floor.  Some BART users have a particular interest in the maintenance and safety conditions in the Civic Center Station, a station where fare evaders are frequently observed.

New proof of fare purchase program

The second reading of a new ordinance (Agenda Item 5 A plus B) will seek to reduce fare avoidance on BART.  BART is very concerned about its estimated annual loss of $15 million to $25 million annually due to non-paying riders.  The proposed solution is requiring passengers anywhere within the paid system area to present proof of fare purchase to a transit official.  For adult violators the fine will be $75 and for juveniles $55.

Prohibition Orders to begin January 1, 2018

Governor Jerry Brown signed AB 730 which will permit BART  authorities to bar persons from BART property for 30, 60 or 90 days if they commit certain acts including violence against riders or BART personnel.

Read BART agenda here. 

Oct 25 2017

Piedmonters Unhappy about San Francisco Civic Center Station 

Piedmonters and other Bay Area taxpayers have generously agreed to tax themselves to improve earthquake preparation of the BART  track system, however during this fall cultural season they are voicing distress at the conditions they encounter at the Civic Center Station in San Francisco.  Most BART stations are serviceable and reasonably clean.  Sadly, at the symbolic core of San Francisco, Civic Center Station’s cleanliness and safety is inadequate, presenting a harsh welcome to tourists and Bay Area residents.  The track area, station, and access points appear not to have been cleaned or sanitized in years.  Security is usually nowhere to be found.  With safety concerns and maintenance problems growing, riders deserve more.

Piedmonters frequently attend opera, concerts, ballet, theater, restaurants and the Asian Art Museum in the Civic Center.  While providing much needed off-peak BART customers, riding BART from the East Bay can avoid bridge traffic and a difficult search for parking in San Francisco.  But Piedmonters are put off by the conditions in the BART/Muni Civic Center Station —and they aren’t alone in such complaints.

“I’ve been working at a job site this week not far from this station. I arrive at this station around 5:30am. Twice this week I’ve witnessed people shooting up heroin right near the bottom of the stairs that lead to Market St. and 8th.”
Sergio C, 10/4/2017 
~~~~~~~~~
“Compared to other BART stations, Civic Center station seems dirtier and it’s got more bums and panhandlers. There have been some incidents in the past seven months. In August 2016, a man was found stabbed inside the station (sfgate.com/crime/article…). Last month (January 2017), at least one person was stabbed near the station (kron4.com/2017/01/06/2-r…).”
Daniel B, 2/25/2017 
~~~~~~~~~~~~
“One thing I don’t like about BART stations in San Francisco is that they always stink. Always”
Sheila C, 2/15/2017 
 In 2014 the San Francisco Chronicle reported on the distressing state of the Civic Center Station.  Sadly, the conditions remain today:

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/A-commuter-s-bane-filthy-smelly-BART-station-5701663.php

Los Angeles offers a surprising contrast to BART.

Busy light rail/bus/Amtrak multi-mode station

Recently, a Piedmont family spent five days on LA Metro visiting a dozen museums and historic sites.  The light rail, subways and stations were clean, with cleaning crews visibly at work and elevators and escalators were all in working order, in contrast to BART, which frequently has nearly a dozen elevators and escalators out of service.  Many Los Angeles stations are bare bones, “found” or “repurposed” such as the elegant old Union Station that is now multi-modal, serving the elevated Gold Line, buses and intercity Amtrak trains.  (see photos)

Not a single coffee cup or napkin on the station floor

 

Despite offering a better experience, LA Metro public transit is less expensive than BART.  While BART has found it unworkable to offer off-peak fares to solve their problem of chronic low ridership off-peak, LA Metro buses and tracked system machines accurately deduct peak and off-peak fares from rider fare cards.

The BART Board

BART Board members (listed below) need to take responsibility for the discouraging conditions riders encounter.

 Money needs to be budgeted for:

  • Security presence and enforcement
  • Camera surveillance
  • Steam cleaning of all surfaces including the track areas
  • Working escalators and elevators
  • Clean, safe steps and access points
  • Clean trains inside and out

Piedmont is currently working on its Climate Action Plan.  Having safe, clean and appropriate modes of public transportation is elementary to reducing Piedmont’s carbon footprint.

Piedmont’s elected BART representative is > Rebecca Saltzman.

Contact numbers and links for BART Board Members are included in their summaries below.  The General Manager is also listed below.

BART Board Members and District Information

Debora Allen
District #1

(Map)

Debora Allen, Director

Stations Included: 

Concord, Lafayette, Pleasant Hill/Contra Costa Centre, Walnut Creek

Counties Included: 

Contra Costa
Joel Keller
District #2

(Map)

Joel Keller, Director

Stations Included: 

North Concord/Martinez, Pittsburg/Bay Point

Counties Included: 

Contra Costa
Rebecca Saltzman
District #3

(Map)

Rebecca Saltzman, President, Piedmont’s Representative on the BART Board

Stations Included: 

Bay Fair, Downtown Berkeley, El Cerrito del Norte (partial), El Cerrito Plaza (partial), North Berkeley, Orinda, Rockridge, San Leandro

Counties Included: 

Alameda/Contra Costa
Robert Raburn
District #4

(Map)

Robert Raburn, Vice President

Stations Included: 

Coliseum/Oakland Airport, Fruitvale, Lake Merritt, 12th Street/Oakland City Center, 19th Street/Oakland, MacArthur (partial)

Counties Included: 

Alameda
John McPartland
District #5

(Map)

John McPartland, Director

Stations Included: 

Castro Valley, Dublin/Pleasanton, Hayward, West Dublin/Pleasanton

Counties Included: 

Alameda
Thomas Blalock
District #6

(Map)

Thomas Blalock, Director

Stations Included: 

Fremont, South Hayward, Union City

Counties Included: 

Alameda
Lateefah Simon
District #7

(Map)

Lateefah Simon, Director

Stations Included: 

Ashby, El Cerrito del Norte (partial), El Cerrito Plaza (partial), MacArthur (partial), Montgomery (partial), Richmond, West Oakland, Embarcadero (partial)

Counties Included: 

Alameda/Contra Costa/San Francisco
Nick Josefowitz
District #8

(Map)

Nick Josefowitz, Director

Stations Included: 

Balboa Park (partial), Embarcadero (partial), Montgomery (partial),

Counties Included: 

San Francisco
Bevan Dufty
District #9

(Map)

Bevan Dufty, Director

Stations Included: 

16th Street Mission, 24th Street Mission, Glen Park, Civic Center, Powell Street, Balboa Park (partial)

Counties Included: 

San Francisco

~~~~~~~~~~

GENERAL MANAGER GRACE CRUNICAN https://www.bart.gov/about/gm

~~~~~~~~~~~

Members of Piedmont’s Climate Action Plan Task Force are:

Tracey Woodruff, Chair

Brett Hondorp

Margaret Ovenden

Steven Schiller

Bruce Wolfe

Oct 25 2017

Reports on the Oct. 16th City Council Meeting –

On Monday, October 16, 2017, five of my fellow classmates and I attended a City Council meeting. The Council convenes twice every month in the Council Chambers of Piedmont City Hall.  At the beginning of the meeting, Betsy Andersen was sworn into the council as a newly appointed council member.

Following this, City Council called the Piedmont Chief of Police and then the Piedmont Fire Chief to discuss the recent Sonoma County fires and give thanks to those who contributed to relief for the victims. The Fire Chief explained that after the fires broke out, the Piedmont Fire department was able to send two fully staffed fire engines to the north bay while still being completely staffed back home. Both the Police and Fire Chiefs also explained how monetary donations to the Red Cross were the best way to help victims of the fires.

Next, the Mayor called for the approval of the consent calendar which unanimously passed. This motion then led straight into the Public Forum in which three of my classmates spoke.

Mira Tellegen spoke first in an eloquently delivered speech detailing her upbringing in Piedmont and how city representatives, law enforcement and residents have affected her life for the better.

Following Mira, Abby Wilson expressed her interest in making Piedmont a sanctuary city in which city law enforcement does not enforce federal immigration and deportation laws, and a statement against the current anti-immigration policies implemented by Congress and the President. Abby referenced how many other U.S. cities such as Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego have declared themselves sanctuary cities in similar protest to U.S. immigration policy.

Closing out the public forum, Alec Opdyke gave a heartfelt thank you to the Piedmont police force for making him, and the rest of Piedmont, feel safe in comparison to the actions of the Los Angeles police force where Alec spends many weekends.

Following the Public Forum, the council introduced a new City Hall employee, Mark Anito, who was chosen out of 70 applicants to be an employee of the Department of Public Works.

The continuing controversy over the implementation of the Crown Castle Wireless Communication facilities was addressed.

Next, began the discussion for the consideration of the many wireless communication networks that Crown Castle had proposed to be set up throughout Piedmont. The first site to be discussed is located at 352 Jerome Avenue. At this time Betsy Andersen recused herself in discussing this specific site as the site lies very close to her own home.

The council started by making clear that no member of city staff selected any of the sites for wireless communication facilities proposed by Crown Castle and that although staff did give suggestions for certain sites, none of them were included in the final proposal. After much discussion surrounding the potentially dangerous radio waves emitted from each facility and their incredibly close proximity to households in Piedmont, the council moved to deny the application set forth for the site at 352 Jerome Avenue.

After similar discussion and ultimate denial for applications at four other sites (located at 150 Highland, 303 Hillside, 1159 Winsor and 428 El Cerrito) public commentary was allowed in which 6 employees of Crown Castle spoke in response to the issues raised against the applications for their facilities.

The government relations manager for Crown Castle explained how the plan for these facilities had been developed over two years and had undergone many revisions to accommodate both Piedmont residents and city staff. He expressed his disappointment in the council’s decision to deny the applications; then brought up the Crown Castle attorney who discussed many of the same points but also touched on the allegations of noncompliance with city noise ordinances.

Finally, Morgan Hunt, the manager of engineering for Crown Castle spoke on the antenna size and coverage. In his speech, he referenced Palo Alto’s use of smaller antennas on every street block but didn’t add any real argument for why Piedmont should do the same thing.

I personally thought the arguments on behalf of Crown Castle were extraordinarily weak. Both the Government relations manager and the Crown Castle Attorney did not especially make any real effort to prove the need for these sites or disprove any of the allegations against them. Instead, they chose to appeal to the council through continued references to the amount of work they personally had put into the project and how hard they had tried to make ends meet for us, as though the council and the city of Piedmont were inconveniencing them with this decision. Needless to say, the council did not reverse any of their decisions.

It was at this point at about 9:00 p.m. that school policy requires us to not be at events required for school, so my fellow students and I filed out of City Hall. We would find out the next morning that the meeting adjourned just before 1 a.m., due to the number of community members who spoke as well as the time spent by the council addressing more Wireless Communications sites.

As we exited, we encountered a group of adults waiting for discussion of a different issue regarding preferential parking on Rose Avenue which is partly in Oakland and partly in Piedmont. Tanya Liv and Sebastian Liv felt that because the preferential parking district affected citizens in Oakland, they and all Oakland citizens living on the 5 Piedmont-Oakland border streets, should have a say in Piedmont city government.

David Weiner intended to speak on the same issue and said that the first step they needed to take was to get a proposal passed that limited preferential parking districts to only apply between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Although they hope to get rid of preferential parking districts altogether, they hoped that the passage of this first proposal will be a step in the right direction.

by Reece Proctor, Piedmont High School Senior

~~~~~~~~~~

At the October 16, 2017, Council Meeting, the Piedmont City Council primarily discussed the eight-new cell towers proposed by Crown Castle and citizens’ concerns regarding the towers. This is the second meeting to discuss this, the first being two weeks earlier, and the next meeting concerning the towers will take place on Oct. 30. In addition to the main topic, the City Clerk swore in a new member, Betsy Smegal Andersen, and discussed the new preferential parking spots adjacent to the intersections of Kingston, Linda & Rose in Piedmont.

Acknowledging Betsy Smegal Andersen, a member of the League of Women Voters spoke giving congratulations to Mrs. Andersen, and telling the audience how proud she was that there were three females on the Piedmont City Council again.

Then three students spoke on the Public Forum, Mira Tellegen, Abby Willson, and Alec Opdyke. Mira Tellegen spoke about how influential Piedmont has been in shaping her life and who she is today. Abby Wilson talked about how the Piedmont City Council should turn Piedmont into a sanctuary city, following other nearby cities (Berkeley, Oakland, Etc.). Finally, Alec Opdyke thanked the Piedmont police for keeping Piedmont safe, comparing police involvement in Piedmont to police involvement in Glendale, California.

Moving onto the main subject of the meeting, the council members started off the cell tower discussion by saying that they had no part in deciding where the five towers were to be placed. They went on to discuss how Crown Castle has changed their building plans to try and satisfy all residents.

Representatives from Crown Castle came up to defend their locations and their reason to build them, but were not able to gain support from the crowd. Six Crown Castle representatives spoke about how they were able to make the poles shorter and move the power supplies underground, but were not able to make the sound emissions under 60 decibels (Piedmont City Law says that it must be under 50 decibels).

While Crown Castle had addressed some problems, sixteen members of the public still came forward to voice their opinion against the towers. Their complaints ranged from the risk of cancer increasing around the poles, to their property value decreasing because of the polls. By the end of the discussion, the Council had decided to not approve five of the sites, leaving the decision for the other three sites until October 30.

The last topic that was the new permitted parking spots for five proposed blocks. The local residents talked about how hard it was to park around their homes because people who work in the surrounding area took spots in front of their houses, therefore they needed parking restrictions on non-residents. The Piedmont City Council decided to try a six-month trial period where local residents would have permitted parking between 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.

At the end of the meeting, I interviewed David Weiner who was at the meeting to discuss the parking issues. The reason he was there was to “discuss the times proposed (10pm-7am) on the parking permit signs” and how all of the five blocks being considered should have preferential parking, including those parts outside of Piedmont in Oakland. He said his next steps are to extend the times on the signs, and in the long-term to find permanent parking for the Kaiser Permanente employees, who are the primary ones taking parking in front of their homes.

By Alec Opdyke, Piedmont High School Senior

~~~~~~~~~

    On Monday, October 16th, the Piedmont City Council met at City Hall. The meetings of the City Council, open for public viewing and comment, occur twice a month at 7:30 p.m.

    The City Council, once called to order, began the meeting by swearing in a new member of City Council, Elizabeth Andersen. Andersen has two daughters at Piedmont High School, senior Jane and freshman Ellie.

    Following Andersen’s swearing in, the Council formally thanked the Piedmont League of Women Voters for the work they do each week to present information on the agenda for the City Council meetings.

    The Council then welcomed Fire Chief Warren McLaren and Police Chief Jeremy Bowers to update activities on the Napa Fires. The Piedmont and Alameda County mutual aid programs allowed the Piedmont government to send law enforcement officers and firefighters along with two fire engines to aid those in the Napa and Sonoma areas.

    “[The fires] were devastating to so many people and will take years to recover from,” Bowers said.

    McLaren said that the aid sent to the fires did not prevent the Fire Department from responding to their usual call volume in Piedmont.

    “At no time were we short staffed here in Piedmont,” McLaren said.

    Mayor Robert McBain then addressed the audience as to the importance of the “AC Alert” program, which sends messages to subscribers in times of crisis. Those interested can sign up on the City webpage, McBain said.

    “Please take advantage of AC Alert,” McBain said.

    In the Public Forum section of the meeting, senior Abigail Willson advocated for Piedmont to take on the status as a sanctuary city and senior Alec Opdyke spoke in support of the police’s efforts in the city. I, senior Mira Tellegen, spoke about how Piedmont as a city and the programs the City Council supports shape children and adolescents in the area, and how the transition to college life will be laced with sadness as the graduates leave the haven of Piedmont.

    The City Council next addressed an application for wireless communication service facilities, or cell towers, in Piedmont, an issue a crowd of citizens had been protesting outside City Hall before the meeting.

    “At no time did any member of City staff select a site or design a facility,” a member of the Council read. “To do so would be unethical, and we hold ourselves to a high ethical standard.”

    The Council considered sites at 340-370 Highland Avenue, 740 Magnolia Avenue, 799 Magnolia Avenue, 150 Highland Avenue, 303 Hillside Avenue, 428 El Cerrito, 352 Jerome Avenue, and 1159 Winsor Avenue. They approved none, and will discuss further at the meeting on Oct. 3o.

    Crown Castle Government Relations Manager Sharon James said that Crown Castle has spent two years planning to install wireless service in Piedmont and redesigned the plan to consider the concerns of the community.

    “Opposition is very strong and unusual,” James said. “Good for you, you have a strong community.”

    James said that Crown Castle’s goal is to provide extra wireless capacity for the city.

    “It’s not about now, it’s about down the road,” James said. “It’s not about kids streaming videos, it’s about being able to contact public safety.”

    James said that whether the push comes from Crown Castle or a different company, the issue of wireless service facilities will continue to be pushed in Piedmont.

    “I’m very disappointed,” James said.

    A member of UC Berkeley Physics Department and Piedmont citizen Peter Harvey said that the current site plan is more intrusive than previous proposals, especially to the environment.

“They should be checking for tree health,” Harvey said.

Other citizens spoke out about concerns over the property values, the health concerns of electromagnetic energy, and the negative effects on Piedmont historical sites like the Park and Community Center.

Outside City Hall, Piedmont and Oakland residents waited together to speak on the issue of preferential parking, as some streets affected contain both Piedmont and Oakland addresses.

“We are trying to make sure that everyone is treated with equity,” Piedmont resident Dawn Margolin said. “We don’t feel that it’s okay to leave people that are on the Oakland side of the street out of this whole equation, without a voice.”

Lake Avenue resident David Weiner said that the issue of parking is not new.

“People have been talking informally for a long time,” Weiner said.

Margolin said that civic engagement is essential in any community.

“I am at City Hall because I believe that we are responsible for our own government,” Margolin said.

    The Oct. 16 meeting adjourned shortly before 1 a.m., and the full agenda can be found on the Piedmont Civic Association website.

by Mira Tellegen, Piedmont High School Senior

Editors Note: Opinions expressed are those of the authors.
Oct 23 2017

Anti-hate signs are being made available to interested Piedmonters.

If you want to obtain a sign, contact Conna McCarthy at > 

mccarthycraigie@gmail.com.  

Also, a limited number of signs are available at the City Clerk’s office in City Hall and at the Piedmont Unified School District Office.